On April 2, we reported that Judge Matthew Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois had issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Department of Labor from enforcing certain provisions of Executive Orders 14173 and 14151, both of which limit or prohibit federal grants or programs relating to “illegal,” “unlawful,” and “immoral” diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”). Earlier this week, Judge Kennelly granted a preliminary injunction in that case, barring the Department of Labor from (1) requiring the plaintiff, Chicago Women in Trades (CWIT), to make certain certifications required by Executive Order 14173, and (2) terminating certain federal grants to CWIT as required by Executive Order 14151.

Certification Requirement

First, the Court enjoined the Department of Labor from requiring any grantee or contractor to make a certification that it does not operate any programs “promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws,” as required by section 3(b)(iv) of Executive Order 14173 (the “Certification Provision”). At oral argument, the government conceded that the Certification Provision attempts to regulate grantees’ speech outside of their federally funded programs. Moreover, the Court found that the Executive Order’s express reference to “programs promoting DEI” is fairly read to be an express reference to speech and advocacy protected by the First Amendment. The Court found that CWIT demonstrated that it was likely to succeed on the merits of its claim challenging the Certification Provision on the basis that the provision violated CWIT’s rights to freedom of speech and advocacy under the First Amendment.

Grant Termination

The Court also enjoined the Department of Labor from terminating the Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations (WANTO) grant, one of the five grants that CWIT receives from the government. The Court held that CWIT was likely to succeed in its claim that the provision of Executive Order 14151 requiring agencies to terminate grants and contracts with organizations that promote DEI violated the separation of powers established by the U.S. Constitution because the Spending Clause of Article 1 of the Constitution gives the “power of the purse” – the power to appropriate funds – to Congress. The Court reasoned that the Spending Clause of the Constitution does not grant the Executive branch authority to add conditions to the disbursement of grants based on political priorities.  Through the WANTO Act, Congress requires the Department of Labor to award grants to, among other things, projects benefitting women. The Court found that, by expressly requiring agencies and departments to terminate all equity-related grants based on conditions that the Executive branch does not have authority to impose, Executive Order 14151 would likely run afoul of the WANTO Act and thereby violate the separation of powers established by the Constitution.

Judge Kennelly’s preliminary injunction largely keeps in place the restrictions imposed in his March 27, 2025 temporary restraining order, narrowing the scope only with respect to termination of grants under Executive Order 14151, pending the outcome of the case in which CWIT seeks permanent relief.

What Is Next?

The District Court in Illinois will next determine whether to issue a permanent injunction that could permanently extend the restrictions on the Department of Labor unless overturned or modified on appeal.  Judge Kennelly has requested that the parties confer and provide a proposed schedule for further proceedings by April 24, 2025. Hahn Loeser & Parks will continue to monitor this issue and provide updates as they become available. 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Matthew K. Grashoff Matthew K. Grashoff

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and…

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and obtaining reversal of an adverse judgment on appeal. Since 2015, Matthew has served as counsel to the Appellate Rules Committee of the Ohio Supreme Court Commission on the Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Photo of Sonja C. Rice Sonja C. Rice

Sonja C. Rice is a partner in the firm’s Business Law Area, member of the firm’s Construction Law Practice Group, chair of the firm’s Women’s Leadership Initiative Steering Committee, and member of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Sonja’s practice focuses on commercial…

Sonja C. Rice is a partner in the firm’s Business Law Area, member of the firm’s Construction Law Practice Group, chair of the firm’s Women’s Leadership Initiative Steering Committee, and member of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Sonja’s practice focuses on commercial transactions and the development and negotiation of a wide variety of commercial contracts, including master services agreements, supply chain and manufacturing agreements, professional services contracts, intellectual property development and licensing agreements, energy savings performance contracts, and facilities management outsourcing agreements.

Photo of Matthew Wagner Matthew Wagner

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous…

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous violations of company policies.

Throughout Matthew’s practice, he has worked on complex discovery, theft of trade secrets, cybersecurity, Title VII, breach of contract, and various labor and employment matters. Matthew believes that the most cost-effective litigation strategy is to avoid lawsuits wherever possible which is why he emphasizes the importances of risk management as a way to mitigate the likelihood of such events from occurring. In the event that litigation cannot be avoided, Matthew is a zealous advocate who works tirelessly to identify the best possible solution and outcome for his clients.

Patrick White

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global…

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global building automation and control systems company. His experience includes negotiating customer and vendor contracts supporting various lines of business, performing risk management assessments, dispute resolution and litigation management.

Patrick has extensive litigation experience in state and federal court, having first-chaired or co-chaired multiple jury trials to verdict.  He has also represented clients in arbitration, mediation and before administrative tribunals.

Prior to joining Hahn Loeser, Patrick was an Assistant General Counsel for the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs where he regularly represented the District before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals, Real Property Tax Appeals Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. During his tenure, he successfully defended the District in an appeal before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals challenging the approval of the subdivision of the lot occupied by the historic landmark Scottish Rite Masonic Temple and the building permit issued for the development of a 140-unit residential community on the site.

In addition to being a licensed attorney, Patrick holds a master’s degree in real estate from Georgetown University and applies his in-depth understanding of zoning, land use and real estate transactional skills to help owners, developers, institutions, and public entities achieve their goals.