We recently wrote about the preliminary injunction entered by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, blocking the Department of Labor from enforcing certain provisions of Executive Orders 14173 and 14151, both of which limit or prohibit federal grants or programs relating to “illegal,” “unlawful,” and “immoral” diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”). The case in Illinois is one of several cases we have reported on that are pending in various District Courts around the country relating to Executive Orders 14173 and 14751. In light of the rapidly changing legal landscape with respect to DEI, federal contractors and grantees are asking how the various court rulings affect each other and what the current state of the law is with respect to these Orders.

We are currently tracking five lawsuits that may impact the enforcement of Executive Orders 14173 and 14151.  Each of the lawsuits challenges the constitutionality of the Executive Orders in U.S. District Courts in California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Maryland and the District of Columbia. To date, only the courts in Maryland and Illinois have issued rulings affecting the enforcement of the Executive Orders. The remaining courts are likely to issue rulings in the coming months as those cases progress, and we will continue to provide timely updates.

In previous posts we reported on the nationwide preliminary injunction granted by the District Court in Maryland that was later stayed by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The stay allows the government to enforce the Executive Orders while the appeal of the preliminary injunction is pending before the Fourth Circuit. 

Meanwhile, the District Court in Illinois has granted a preliminary injunction that is limited to the Department of Labor. Specifically, the Department of Labor may not enforce the “Certification Provision” of Executive Order 14173, which requires a federal contractor or grantee to certify that it does not operate any programs “promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.”  The preliminary injunction also enjoined the Department of Labor from enforcing the “Termination Provision” of Executive Order 14151, which requires the termination of equity-related grants, but this injunction applies only to the Plaintiff, Chicago Women in Trades, and only as to one of its five grants.  As to all other federal contractors and grantees, the Termination Provision is currently enforceable.

The current status of Executive Order 14173 is that it is fully enforceable by the federal government except only that the Department of Labor may not require a contractor or grantee to make certification that it does not operate any programs “promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.”  The Order included a 90-day period in which contractors were allowed to continue under the prior regulations, but that 90-day period has now expired. Federal contractors should expect updated guidance from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), but currently no guidance has been published.

For now, federal contractors and grantees should be prepared to comply with the Executive Orders and direction from OFCCP as it comes out. Hahn Loeser & Parks will continue to monitor this issue and provide updates as they become available

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Matthew K. Grashoff Matthew K. Grashoff

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and…

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and obtaining reversal of an adverse judgment on appeal. Since 2015, Matthew has served as counsel to the Appellate Rules Committee of the Ohio Supreme Court Commission on the Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Photo of Sonja C. Rice Sonja C. Rice

Sonja C. Rice is a partner in the firm’s Business Law Area, member of the firm’s Construction Law Practice Group, chair of the firm’s Women’s Leadership Initiative Steering Committee, and member of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Sonja’s practice focuses on commercial…

Sonja C. Rice is a partner in the firm’s Business Law Area, member of the firm’s Construction Law Practice Group, chair of the firm’s Women’s Leadership Initiative Steering Committee, and member of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Sonja’s practice focuses on commercial transactions and the development and negotiation of a wide variety of commercial contracts, including master services agreements, supply chain and manufacturing agreements, professional services contracts, intellectual property development and licensing agreements, energy savings performance contracts, and facilities management outsourcing agreements.

Photo of Matthew Wagner Matthew Wagner

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous…

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous violations of company policies.

Throughout Matthew’s practice, he has worked on complex discovery, theft of trade secrets, cybersecurity, Title VII, breach of contract, and various labor and employment matters. Matthew believes that the most cost-effective litigation strategy is to avoid lawsuits wherever possible which is why he emphasizes the importances of risk management as a way to mitigate the likelihood of such events from occurring. In the event that litigation cannot be avoided, Matthew is a zealous advocate who works tirelessly to identify the best possible solution and outcome for his clients.

Patrick White

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global…

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global building automation and control systems company. His experience includes negotiating customer and vendor contracts supporting various lines of business, performing risk management assessments, dispute resolution and litigation management.

Patrick has extensive litigation experience in state and federal court, having first-chaired or co-chaired multiple jury trials to verdict.  He has also represented clients in arbitration, mediation and before administrative tribunals.

Prior to joining Hahn Loeser, Patrick was an Assistant General Counsel for the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs where he regularly represented the District before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals, Real Property Tax Appeals Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. During his tenure, he successfully defended the District in an appeal before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals challenging the approval of the subdivision of the lot occupied by the historic landmark Scottish Rite Masonic Temple and the building permit issued for the development of a 140-unit residential community on the site.

In addition to being a licensed attorney, Patrick holds a master’s degree in real estate from Georgetown University and applies his in-depth understanding of zoning, land use and real estate transactional skills to help owners, developers, institutions, and public entities achieve their goals.