On March 27, 2025, Judge Matthew Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Department of Labor from enforcing certain provisions of Executive Orders 14173 and 14151, both of which limited or prohibited federal grants or programs relating to “illegal,” “unlawful,” and “immoral” diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”). The plaintiff in the case, Chicago Women in Trades (“CWIT”), is a non-profit organization that prepares women to enter and remain in skilled trades and that receives federal funding from the Department of Labor. CWIT’s lawsuit challenged the DEI-related Executive Orders on various grounds, including that the Orders violate CWIT’s rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. CWIT requested a temporary restraining order preventing the enforcement of the Executive Orders and alleging that their enforcement would cause it irreparable harm. 

Judge Kennelly found that the provision of EO 14173 requiring federal contractors and grant recipients to certify that they do not operate any programs “promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws,” likely violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and that its enforcement would cause irreparable harm to the plaintiff. Judge Kennelly’s ruling with respect to the certification provision of EO 14173 applies only to contracts and grants issued by the Department of Labor and not to all federal agencies. 

Additionally, the ruling restricts the Department of Labor from enforcing the provision of EO 14151 requiring agencies to terminate grants and contracts with agencies that promote DEI, but only with respect to CWIT and not to any other federal contractors or grantees.

What is Next?

The District Court in Illinois will next determine whether to issue a preliminary injunction which could extend the restrictions on the Department of Labor while the case is pending before the court.  A hearing will be held on April 10, 2025 on the preliminary injunction, and a ruling can be expected shortly thereafter. Less than two weeks ago in a similar case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the government’s request to stay a nationwide preliminary injunction that had blocked the same provisions of the Executive Orders allowing the government to enforce the Executive Orders while the appeal is pending. The government may file a similar request in the CWIT case. Hahn Loeser & Parks will continue to monitor this issue and provide updates as they become available.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Matthew K. Grashoff Matthew K. Grashoff

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and…

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and obtaining reversal of an adverse judgment on appeal. Since 2015, Matthew has served as counsel to the Appellate Rules Committee of the Ohio Supreme Court Commission on the Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Photo of Sonja C. Rice Sonja C. Rice

Sonja C. Rice is a partner in the firm’s Business Law Area, member of the firm’s Construction Law Practice Group, chair of the firm’s Women’s Leadership Initiative Steering Committee, and member of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Sonja’s practice focuses on commercial…

Sonja C. Rice is a partner in the firm’s Business Law Area, member of the firm’s Construction Law Practice Group, chair of the firm’s Women’s Leadership Initiative Steering Committee, and member of the firm’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Sonja’s practice focuses on commercial transactions and the development and negotiation of a wide variety of commercial contracts, including master services agreements, supply chain and manufacturing agreements, professional services contracts, intellectual property development and licensing agreements, energy savings performance contracts, and facilities management outsourcing agreements.

Photo of Matthew Wagner Matthew Wagner

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous…

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous violations of company policies.

Throughout Matthew’s practice, he has worked on complex discovery, theft of trade secrets, cybersecurity, Title VII, breach of contract, and various labor and employment matters. Matthew believes that the most cost-effective litigation strategy is to avoid lawsuits wherever possible which is why he emphasizes the importances of risk management as a way to mitigate the likelihood of such events from occurring. In the event that litigation cannot be avoided, Matthew is a zealous advocate who works tirelessly to identify the best possible solution and outcome for his clients.

Patrick White

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global…

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global building automation and control systems company. His experience includes negotiating customer and vendor contracts supporting various lines of business, performing risk management assessments, dispute resolution and litigation management.

Patrick has extensive litigation experience in state and federal court, having first-chaired or co-chaired multiple jury trials to verdict.  He has also represented clients in arbitration, mediation and before administrative tribunals.

Prior to joining Hahn Loeser, Patrick was an Assistant General Counsel for the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs where he regularly represented the District before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals, Real Property Tax Appeals Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. During his tenure, he successfully defended the District in an appeal before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals challenging the approval of the subdivision of the lot occupied by the historic landmark Scottish Rite Masonic Temple and the building permit issued for the development of a 140-unit residential community on the site.

In addition to being a licensed attorney, Patrick holds a master’s degree in real estate from Georgetown University and applies his in-depth understanding of zoning, land use and real estate transactional skills to help owners, developers, institutions, and public entities achieve their goals.