On March 26, 2026, the President issued Executive Order 14398, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors” (the “Order” or “EO 14398”).  The Order buttresses Executive Order 14173, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” (“EO 14173”) issued on January 21, 2025, which we have previously reported on. EO 14173 revoked the longstanding affirmative action requirements for federal contractors of Executive Order 11246 and imposed a certification requirement causing contractors to certify that they do not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws. 

EO 14398 establishes a new mandatory federal contract clause requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to agree that “in connection with the performance of work under [the applicable] contract” they (i) “will not engage in any racially discriminatory DEI activities,” (ii) will provide access to books and records for purposes of ascertaining compliance, and (iii) report any “known or reasonably knowable conduct” of a subcontractor that may violate the prohibition against “racially discriminatory DEI activities.”  The contract clause required by the Order also embeds a contractual acknowledgement that compliance is material to government payment decisions for purposes of the False Claims Act, creating additional exposure for non-compliance.

The Order defines “racially discriminatory DEI activities” as disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in the recruitment, employment (e.g. hiring, promotions), contracting (e.g., vendor agreements), program participation, or allocation or deployment of any entity’s resources.  Further, “program participation” is defined in the Order as membership or participation in, or access or admission to: training, mentoring, or leadership development programs; educational opportunities; clubs; associations; or similar opportunities that are sponsored or established by the contractor or subcontractor.  This definition encompasses a wide variety of activities that may violate the Order if they favor or burden any race or ethnicity. 

The Order requires the mandatory clause to flow down through subcontracts, imposing the obligations at each tier. Contractors at each tier will be required to include the clause in their subcontracts and will be subject to the requirement to report any “known or reasonably knowable conduct” of a subcontractor that may violate the prohibition against “racially discriminatory DEI activities.”  The prime contractor is obligated to report potential violations of any subcontractor and is exposed to a range of penalties set forth in the Order for noncompliance by any subcontractor.  Penalties for non-compliance by contractors and subcontractors include contract termination, suspension, debarment and exposure to civil action under the False Claims Act. EO 14398 requires that all federal agencies must add the new mandatory clause to their contracts and “contract-like instruments” within 30 days, by April 25, 2026. 

The Order effectively narrows the scope of permissible diversity initiatives contractors can engage in when doing business with the federal government and these prohibitions flow down to all subcontractors. This may create tension with relevant state and local affirmative action requirements, many of which affect race.  Contractors should carefully review their practices in light of the prohibitions in EO 14398 with an eye toward seeking a balance that could avoid risk under the Order without overcorrecting and being out of compliance with state and local mandates. 

Hahn Loeser will continue to monitor the implementation of EO 14398 closely and provide updates as they become available.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Patrick White Patrick White

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global…

J. Patrick White is Of Counsel in Hahn Loeser’s Chicago office. Patrick handles a wide variety of commercial litigation, construction, real estate and related transactional matters. He has acted as outside general counsel for real estate services firms, as well as a global building automation and control systems company. His experience includes negotiating customer and vendor contracts supporting various lines of business, performing risk management assessments, dispute resolution and litigation management.

Patrick has extensive litigation experience in state and federal court, having first-chaired or co-chaired multiple jury trials to verdict.  He has also represented clients in arbitration, mediation and before administrative tribunals.

Prior to joining Hahn Loeser, Patrick was an Assistant General Counsel for the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs where he regularly represented the District before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals, Real Property Tax Appeals Commission, and the Office of Administrative Hearings. During his tenure, he successfully defended the District in an appeal before the D.C. Board of Zoning Appeals challenging the approval of the subdivision of the lot occupied by the historic landmark Scottish Rite Masonic Temple and the building permit issued for the development of a 140-unit residential community on the site.

In addition to being a licensed attorney, Patrick holds a master’s degree in real estate from Georgetown University and applies his in-depth understanding of zoning, land use and real estate transactional skills to help owners, developers, institutions, and public entities achieve their goals.

Photo of Matthew K. Grashoff Matthew K. Grashoff

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and…

Matthew K. Grashoff focuses his practice on commercial litigation and has experience in the areas of insurance coverage, appellate practice, oil and gas, and real estate litigation. He has represented clients through all stages of litigation, including participating in a jury trial and obtaining reversal of an adverse judgment on appeal. Since 2015, Matthew has served as counsel to the Appellate Rules Committee of the Ohio Supreme Court Commission on the Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Photo of Matthew Wagner Matthew Wagner

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous…

Matthew Wagner is an associate in Hahn Loeser’s Litigation Practice Area and focuses on complex commercial litigation. Matthew’s experience includes a wide variety of civil litigation, government investigations and white-collar criminal law. His investigation issues have included healthcare fraud, banking regulations, and miscellaneous violations of company policies.

Throughout Matthew’s practice, he has worked on complex discovery, theft of trade secrets, cybersecurity, Title VII, breach of contract, and various labor and employment matters. Matthew believes that the most cost-effective litigation strategy is to avoid lawsuits wherever possible which is why he emphasizes the importances of risk management as a way to mitigate the likelihood of such events from occurring. In the event that litigation cannot be avoided, Matthew is a zealous advocate who works tirelessly to identify the best possible solution and outcome for his clients.